Aileen Wuornos: The Selling of a Serial Killer
THE STORY:
This Nick Broomfield documentary chronicles the turbulent life of serial-killer, Aileen Wurnos, and the way in which her crimes have profited those people around her.
Now to help Nick charter this tale, he utilizes a number of sources. For example, archived television clips, real life footage of Aileen’s time in court and in prison, interviews with friends and foes alike, as well as first hand commentary from the woman herself, Aileen Wurnos.
Please note, although Nick’s path to Aileen is a troubled one, he is able to meander his way through numerous personages, all of whom appear to be either profiteering from his chronicle, or alternatively, just plain refuse to have anything to do with him. Nevertheless, Nick is determined to find out the truth behind this story, and he pieces together, bit by bit: (1) What the true nature of Aileen’s path of destruction was? And (2) Why are people able to make money from her crimes?
These are some of the people who aide him to answer these questions:
ACQUAINTANCES: Aileen last male companion, Dick Mills, irately speaks about her last week with him, and how the media has perverted Aileen's story to be something more that it was. Also, two of Aileen's pals from her local bar, 'the Last Resort', Cannonball and Jesse Aviles, speak of Aileen’s capture at this lo-cal.
AUTHORS: Two authors, Michael McCarthy and Mike Reynolds, try to elaborate the motives behind Aileen’s murder spree, surmising that her actions were due to her hatred of her father (who committed suicide in jail), a need to take care of her last love (Tyra Moore), and her neglected and harsh upbringing (In Michigan).
STEVE GLAZER: Aileen’s second lawyer, Steve Glazer, is a rather jovial character all in all. His demeanor is quite refreshing compared to your average lawyer, although he does not seem really equipped to deal with Aileen’s case. During Nick’s investigations, Steve acts as a mediator between Nick and Aileen's adoptive mother, Arlene Pralle, bartering appropriate fees for appropriate information.
ARLENE PRALLE: I am afraid to say that Arlene Pralle’s story is a costly one for Nick. Granted, at first, this does not seem so apparent - because she coyly busies herself with her normal job (breading horses) whilst keeping her opinions and her story to herself. But then, once Nick pays up some cash, Arlene warmly tells him about who she adopted Aileen in prison – her spiritual nature – how she used this to ‘find’ Aileen – and how she has managed to persuade Aileen to change her plea form not guilty to no-contest (thus sealing Aileen’s fate and opening her pocket). Eventually, Arlene's true colors are shown, leading Nick to...
AILEEN WURNOS: Initially, Nick is only allowed to get Aileen’s story from numerous media sources and snippet of information relayed to him from the others in this tale. However, when he eventually does get to speak to Aileen himself, what she says to him confirms his suspicions. She’s irate with both Steve and Arlene for goading her to change her plea, whilst making money off of her crime in the process. Others seem to have profited from Aileen as well, such as her last love (Tyra Moore), her lover before that also (both male and female), and then there is the media. Numerous magazine articles, movie deals, and other sources of publications have also gained from Aileen’s crimes, all engineered, one way or the other, by what Aileen reefers to as the ‘crooked cops’. A story that is substantiated by...
SGT. BRIAN JARVIS: Brian was one of the police officers involved in the Aileen Wurnos case. And even though he is positive that she did commit the crimes she has been charged with, at the same time he is unsure of her lover, Tyra Moore. You see, when Brian was in the police force, he did try to pursue this matter further. But strangely, he was halted from doing do by ‘other officers’ who managed to: (A) Get him transferred out of the department. And (B) Break into his house and delete any information he has on his computer relating to Aileen’s case. Brian has tried to pursue this matter further, but he has been delayed from doing so.
Some months later, a number of officers resign from the police department due to a connection between them, a movie company, and Tyra Moore – all relating to the Aileen Wurnos case.
THE REVIEW:
I first watched 'Aileen Wurnos - The Selling Of A Serial Killer', quite some time ago on television. Maybe a couple years after it was first produced. And do you know what? This program has had a strange affect on me since then. You see, it has opened up my eyes to a rather personable way of documentary film-making, as well as informing me of a rather alarming subject matter which I didn't think was possible.
Well, my God! What an f*cked-up tale! Can you imagine that people are actually able to make money from a crime such as murder? Fair enough, in this documentary, Nick doesn't go to that much length to prove if Aileen did commit these murders or not. Instead, he concentrates on the sub-threat of this story (i.e. the 'selling part').
The strange thing with this is though, is that at the beginning of this film, it states the ‘Son of Sam’ law - highlighting that no one can benefit from a crime. Then, after this is shown, it presents just the opposite – many people benefiting from a crime!
Boy, you have to hand it to Nick, don't you! He’s one gutsy b*stard. Just ploughing his way through all these dubious characters, and presenting us with a true life tale behind a ghastly one. Also, in addition to this, this documentary is shown in a very nice way as well - with Nick acting in two capacities: (1) The tour guide for Aileen’s crimes. And (2) The investigator behind those people who are profiteering from her crimes. Moreover, Nick tries his best to stay impartial to everything around him, such as Aileen’s motives – Aileen’s past – and the way people are making money from Aileen.
However, there is one point in which he does let the proverbial cat out of the bag - when he has a brash face off with bible basing money grabber, Arlene Pralle. Still, all in all, he does present a well balanced documentary in which you - the viewer - decide who is guilty or not.
Please note, that Nick made 'Aileen Wurnos - The Selling Of A Serial Killer' way before Charlize Theron's portrayal of her in the movie 'Monster' (click here for review). So now you know the film behind the film, it makes you think, huh? Was Aileen a martyr to money? Was she used as a device to highlight prostitution, murder, and a new breed of criminal? And why were police involved with a movie company? Plus, does the media play a part in orchestrating story's for their project? Agreed Aileen?
Hmm - good documentary about a troubling subject matter.
THE RATING: A
Now to help Nick charter this tale, he utilizes a number of sources. For example, archived television clips, real life footage of Aileen’s time in court and in prison, interviews with friends and foes alike, as well as first hand commentary from the woman herself, Aileen Wurnos.
Please note, although Nick’s path to Aileen is a troubled one, he is able to meander his way through numerous personages, all of whom appear to be either profiteering from his chronicle, or alternatively, just plain refuse to have anything to do with him. Nevertheless, Nick is determined to find out the truth behind this story, and he pieces together, bit by bit: (1) What the true nature of Aileen’s path of destruction was? And (2) Why are people able to make money from her crimes?
These are some of the people who aide him to answer these questions:
ACQUAINTANCES: Aileen last male companion, Dick Mills, irately speaks about her last week with him, and how the media has perverted Aileen's story to be something more that it was. Also, two of Aileen's pals from her local bar, 'the Last Resort', Cannonball and Jesse Aviles, speak of Aileen’s capture at this lo-cal.
AUTHORS: Two authors, Michael McCarthy and Mike Reynolds, try to elaborate the motives behind Aileen’s murder spree, surmising that her actions were due to her hatred of her father (who committed suicide in jail), a need to take care of her last love (Tyra Moore), and her neglected and harsh upbringing (In Michigan).
STEVE GLAZER: Aileen’s second lawyer, Steve Glazer, is a rather jovial character all in all. His demeanor is quite refreshing compared to your average lawyer, although he does not seem really equipped to deal with Aileen’s case. During Nick’s investigations, Steve acts as a mediator between Nick and Aileen's adoptive mother, Arlene Pralle, bartering appropriate fees for appropriate information.
ARLENE PRALLE: I am afraid to say that Arlene Pralle’s story is a costly one for Nick. Granted, at first, this does not seem so apparent - because she coyly busies herself with her normal job (breading horses) whilst keeping her opinions and her story to herself. But then, once Nick pays up some cash, Arlene warmly tells him about who she adopted Aileen in prison – her spiritual nature – how she used this to ‘find’ Aileen – and how she has managed to persuade Aileen to change her plea form not guilty to no-contest (thus sealing Aileen’s fate and opening her pocket). Eventually, Arlene's true colors are shown, leading Nick to...
AILEEN WURNOS: Initially, Nick is only allowed to get Aileen’s story from numerous media sources and snippet of information relayed to him from the others in this tale. However, when he eventually does get to speak to Aileen himself, what she says to him confirms his suspicions. She’s irate with both Steve and Arlene for goading her to change her plea, whilst making money off of her crime in the process. Others seem to have profited from Aileen as well, such as her last love (Tyra Moore), her lover before that also (both male and female), and then there is the media. Numerous magazine articles, movie deals, and other sources of publications have also gained from Aileen’s crimes, all engineered, one way or the other, by what Aileen reefers to as the ‘crooked cops’. A story that is substantiated by...
SGT. BRIAN JARVIS: Brian was one of the police officers involved in the Aileen Wurnos case. And even though he is positive that she did commit the crimes she has been charged with, at the same time he is unsure of her lover, Tyra Moore. You see, when Brian was in the police force, he did try to pursue this matter further. But strangely, he was halted from doing do by ‘other officers’ who managed to: (A) Get him transferred out of the department. And (B) Break into his house and delete any information he has on his computer relating to Aileen’s case. Brian has tried to pursue this matter further, but he has been delayed from doing so.
Some months later, a number of officers resign from the police department due to a connection between them, a movie company, and Tyra Moore – all relating to the Aileen Wurnos case.
THE REVIEW:
I first watched 'Aileen Wurnos - The Selling Of A Serial Killer', quite some time ago on television. Maybe a couple years after it was first produced. And do you know what? This program has had a strange affect on me since then. You see, it has opened up my eyes to a rather personable way of documentary film-making, as well as informing me of a rather alarming subject matter which I didn't think was possible.
Well, my God! What an f*cked-up tale! Can you imagine that people are actually able to make money from a crime such as murder? Fair enough, in this documentary, Nick doesn't go to that much length to prove if Aileen did commit these murders or not. Instead, he concentrates on the sub-threat of this story (i.e. the 'selling part').
The strange thing with this is though, is that at the beginning of this film, it states the ‘Son of Sam’ law - highlighting that no one can benefit from a crime. Then, after this is shown, it presents just the opposite – many people benefiting from a crime!
Boy, you have to hand it to Nick, don't you! He’s one gutsy b*stard. Just ploughing his way through all these dubious characters, and presenting us with a true life tale behind a ghastly one. Also, in addition to this, this documentary is shown in a very nice way as well - with Nick acting in two capacities: (1) The tour guide for Aileen’s crimes. And (2) The investigator behind those people who are profiteering from her crimes. Moreover, Nick tries his best to stay impartial to everything around him, such as Aileen’s motives – Aileen’s past – and the way people are making money from Aileen.
However, there is one point in which he does let the proverbial cat out of the bag - when he has a brash face off with bible basing money grabber, Arlene Pralle. Still, all in all, he does present a well balanced documentary in which you - the viewer - decide who is guilty or not.
Please note, that Nick made 'Aileen Wurnos - The Selling Of A Serial Killer' way before Charlize Theron's portrayal of her in the movie 'Monster' (click here for review). So now you know the film behind the film, it makes you think, huh? Was Aileen a martyr to money? Was she used as a device to highlight prostitution, murder, and a new breed of criminal? And why were police involved with a movie company? Plus, does the media play a part in orchestrating story's for their project? Agreed Aileen?
Hmm - good documentary about a troubling subject matter.
THE RATING: A
