Now imagine you can look at me without me being able to look at you, and then you'd have a pretty good idea what the premise behind this film is all about. Yeah. This film. One Directed by Edgar G. Ulmer; and Starring: Marguerite Chapman, Douglas Kennedy, with James Griffith. It was made in 1960, and lasted for 57 minutes.
The Amazing Transparent Man
The Amazing Transparent Man
THE STORY:
Alright, guys and gal, gather round, so I can tell you what
I want you all to do.
You, Laura Matson (Marguerite Chapman), I want you to help Joey
Faust (Douglas Kennedy) escape from prison, and then drive him back to my
place. You, Dr. Peter Ulof (Ivan Triesault), I want you to stop moaning about how
I've kidnapped your daughter, and concentrate on showing our escaped convict
how you will turn him invisible with the use of a guinea pig. And you,
nondescript henchman with a shotgun and a moustache, I want you to keep an eye
on Joey, just in case he tries to esca.... THUNK!
Huh? What's that sound? Come on. One of you tell me what the
hell is going on! I'm your boss, God damn it! Me, Major Paul Krenner (James
Griffith)! I'm the man with the big ideas which will earn every singe one of us
a lot of cash if they play out properly!
Oh! Nothings wrong? Ah-ha. Thank God for that! For a moment there I
suspected Joey was going to do a runner! But then again, that's most probably why
what next transpires doesn't necessarily go according to plan. As the first heist
goes OK - an X-ray machine shouldn't sell well on ebay - a scientist whimpers
about his daughter - and at the end of the day an adventure ends not in the way
it ought to.
THE REVIEW:
Now to be absolutely honest with you, dear reader, I wasn't
expecting very much when I first sat down and watched, 'The Astonishing Invisible
Man'. I thought to myself 'Well, the title sound's cr*p, plus I've never heard
of some of the cast before, so it'd probably be one of those films I'd scoff
at half way through'.
But I didn't you know. Honestly I didn't. At best it's the
type of movie that showed a lot of promise the more I watched it, yet at the
very same time lacked both substance and style.
You see, on the one hand, the story-line was pretty straightforward to follow. Whilst, on the other hand, all the characters were pretty one-dimensional in tone, plus the special effects on offer were rather naff to say the least. Furthermore, I felt that it was half a film too. Cause it ended when things were starting to look very-very good.
You see, on the one hand, the story-line was pretty straightforward to follow. Whilst, on the other hand, all the characters were pretty one-dimensional in tone, plus the special effects on offer were rather naff to say the least. Furthermore, I felt that it was half a film too. Cause it ended when things were starting to look very-very good.
I mean, it was as if I was watching a set-up for a gala
adventure full of crime, drama, and all of that sort of thing. However, once
the premise was put in place, and that whole 'Invisible man / robber' scenario
was finally on its way, the whole damn tale stopped dead in its tracks. Boom!
Finito. Ending with the scientist guy posing a pertinent question to the camera
that I thought was a somewhat enigmatic note to end on.
Anyway. Let's hold it right there for the moment, shall we?
As this sounds like a good time for some filmic-facts. (1) 'American
International Pictures' first released this production on the same month a riot
broke out during the 'Newport Jazz Festival' -- July, 1960. (2) Loosely
translated, this project was entitled 'Astonishingly Transparent Man' in Poland ;
'The Incredible Invisible Man' in France ,
and was originally given the working title, 'Search for a Shadow'. (3) Apart
from those scenes shot at 'United National Studios', the rest of this flick was
shot on location in the Berkshires, Massachusetts ,
plus the USA Fair
Park , Dallas ,
Texas . (4) I kid you not; Edgar G. Ulmer
shot this movie back-to-back with another one of his sci-fi flicks, 'Beyond the
Time Barrier', within just two weeks. (5) Footage from this feature can be seen
in the 1985 documentary, 'AIP: Fast and Furious', the 1992 TV-movie,
'Trailer Cinema', and within an episode of 1995's 'Mystery Science Theater
3000'. (6) Not only was this Marguerite Chapman's final film appearance, but it
was also Edgar Ulmer's final American film too. (7) Jack Lewis, who devised the
screenplay for this picture, was once a stuntman, an actor, a musical editor on
'What's
Up, Tiger Lily?', as well as devising other such... coff-coff...
'classics', as 'Billy the Kid vs. Dracula'. (8) After this movie was unleashed,
Douglas Kennedy starred in 'Flight of the Lost Balloon'; Ivan Triesault starred
in 'Cimarron '; and James Griffith starred in
'Spartacus'.
OK. So where was I? Oh, yeah. The ethical dilemma the scientist
posed at the end of this piece. Well, for yours truly, I did get a right kick
out of this question, because in a round about way it kind of underpinned the
overall movie in both favor and girth.
Come on. Let's face it. Are scientists going too far with
innovative investigations? And if so, are procedures in place to make sure they
don't fall into the wrong hands? Also, whose hand should they be in, and how can
you be sure that this is the case?
Do you see what I'm driving at, dear reader? Although 'The Astonishing
Invisible Man' seems like a very one-dimensional and simple tale on the
surface, underneath it all, it has a very important question that needs to be addressed.
Now who can answer this question for us? Not me. I wouldn't
even dare try. And not the makers of this movie either. Still, it was a very intriguing
end to a somewhat old-school yarn. And with that, all I have left to say is...
Nuff said. Ha!
THE RATING: B-
THE AMAZING TRANSPARENT MAN
Reviewed by David Andrews
on
December 18, 2013
Rating: